spacer Site Map Contact Us Directions CHAPA Home
Citizens' Housing and Planning Association spacer CHAPA logo
Drop-down menus
Calendar of Events
Chapter 40B
Housing Briefs

January 28, 2004

Governor's Budget Increases Funds for Public Housing, But Cuts Rental Assistance

House 1, the governor's budget proposal for FY 2005, was released today. It includes $70,191,248 in direct state operating funds for the Department of Housing and Community Development. This represents an increase of approximately $3 million from FY 2004.

Public housing was the largest beneficiary. Operating subsidies would increase by nearly $5 million under the governor's proposal, and public housing residents would see the rent escrow program revived and fully funded at $500,000, a level last seen in FY 2001. In the Housing Services line item (includes Housing Consumer Education Centers), the governor's proposal eliminates earmarks in the current language and would increase the account by $120,000.

Despite the good news, rental assistance programs that could provide immediate assistance to low income families continue to suffer reductions. Funding for the Massachusetts Rental Voucher Program is reduced by $2,581,728 as mobile vouchers would not be reissued upon turnover. The Alternative Housing Voucher Program for people with disabilities would receive only $2.3 million, level funding from FY 2004, but well below the $4 million originally promised when the program was to help 800 people and even less than the $2.7 approved by legislature last year before it was vetoed by the governor. Also, the budget does not include any money to replace funding that non-profit, community-based developers lost last year when the CEED program was eliminated.

Similar to last year, the administration has proposed an outside section that would implement monthly minimum rents for public housing residents. The monthly minimum rent would be $50 per bedroom per household. This time, however, the proposal includes language that would require housing authorities to grant exemptions in cases of "severe financial hardship."

Key DHCD Programs:

Line Item Program Gov. FY 05
7004-0000 Development Coord. Council $240,000
7004-0099 DHCD Administration $6,741,726
7004-3036 Housing Services $541,000
7004-4314 Service Coordinators $490,401
7004-9004 Public Housing Rent Escrow $500,000
7004-9005 Public Hsng Operating Subsidies $30,271,292
7004-9024 Mass. Rental Voucher Program $20,106,829
7004-9030 AHVP $2,300,000
7004-9033 Mental Health Rental Subsidies $2,000,000
7004-9201 Interest Subsidies for Private Dev $5,500,000
7004-9315 Federal LIHTC $1,500,000

MassHousing Announces $100 Million Housing Production Program

Earlier this week Governor Romney announced the creation of MassHousing's Priority Development Fund. The $100 million fund will be used to provide "gap filler," low- and no- interest loans to increase the supply of mixed-income rental housing. MassHousing anticipates that the fund will lead to the creation of 5,000 homes and leverage $1 billion.

Developers (non-profit and limited dividend) who receive first mortgage financing from MassHousing will be eligible for the funds if at least 20% of the homes are affordable to families with incomes of less than 80% of the area median and if the homes are "new production." There will be a preference for developments that comply with the Commonwealth's Smart Growth principles.

The breakdown of the $100 million is as follows:

  • $75 million for mixed-income communities throughout the state where at least 20% of the units are affordable to low income persons (those below 80% of the area median income)
  • $22 million for construction of mixed-income housing around transit nodes
  • $3 million for comprehensive planning for communities looking to develop affordable housing plans consistent with the Commonwealth's Smart Growth principles
  • More details, including a fact sheet, guidelines and list of FAQs, are available at MassHousing's web site: www.masshousing.com.

    CHAPA and MHP Release New Housing Study

    The state's inability to keep pace with housing demand is forcing more than 600,000 households to spend more than 30 percent of their income on housing, and 250,000 of those are spending more than 50 percent, a burden felt most by lower-income families and young adults, according to a new University of Massachusetts Donahue Institute study.

    Entitled "Winners and Losers in the Massachusetts Housing Market," the study-sponsored by CHAPA and the Massachusetts Housing Partnership--uses the 2000 census and other data to quantify the state's housing shortfall and its impact on the population and land use. The study concludes that the state's failure to meet housing demands has created a three-class system of "haves," "have nots," and "hidden homeless," a growing third class of people who live with relatives or friends because they can't find affordable housing.

    The "haves" are those who bought their homes previous to the dramatic rise in housing prices over the past four years, and who have benefited from both rising prices and lower interest rates, the study says. The "have nots" are lower-income people and people new to the market who must use more of their income to buy a home, or must pay increasingly high rents for a dwindling supply of rental apartments or seek cheaper housing farther away from job centers.

    The third class - the hidden homeless - appears to be the most obvious example of the state's failure to keep up with housing demand as the 2000 census found that this category - referred to as sub-families - has jumped dramatically. The report found that the number of children in subfamilies has grown by 488 percent since 1980, from 26,000 to 52,000.

    "There is a widening gap between what people earn and what it costs to rent or buy a home in Massachusetts," said Clark Ziegler, executive director of MHP. "We need to eliminate the barriers that make affordable housing so difficult to build. Otherwise, people will move farther away and commute longer to their jobs, or leave the state entirely in search of housing they can afford."

    The study also found that of this total, over 91,000 homeowners and 160,000 renters paid more than 50 percent of their income on housing in 2000. Generally, a household that pays more than 30 percent of its income in housing costs is considered to be paying a burdensome amount.

    The increasing cost of homeownership was responsible for the rise in households spending a burdensome amount. The study found that between 1990 and 2000, the amount of owner-occupied households paying more than 30 percent of their income on housing grew by 30,000 to 269,000, or 22 percent of all homeowners in Massachusetts. The study found that nearly one-third of the people paying more than 30 percent had bought their homes in 1999 and 2000.

    In terms of income, census data revealed that in metropolitan Boston, more than 41 percent of all homeowner households making below the median household income of $50,515 per year pay over 30 percent for housing. Statewide, 37 percent of those making median income pay more than 30 percent of their income on housing.

    The study also found:

  • Between 1980 and 2003, the nation's largest overall percentage increase in housing prices took place in Massachusetts.
  • The failure to build enough new housing largely explains why prices increased. Between 1990 and 2000, the number of new households in Massachusetts grew by 8.7 percent, whereas the number of new housing units increased by 6 percent. To keep pace, the state would have needed to produce 70,000 more housing units than it did.
  • From 1990 to 2000, there was a significant loss of two-family, five-to-nine family and 10-to-19 family structures. During the 1990s, 37,563 new multifamily units were created but 20,236 existing units were lost.
  • Between 1990 and 2000, the number of vacant units in Massachusetts declined by nearly 48,000, mostly in multi-family housing. The supply of vacant single-family homes dropped by 6 percent whereas the number of vacant units in multi-family buildings dropped by 43 percent.
  • From 1990 to 2000, 157,000 single-family homes were built while only 17,327 new multi-family units were added.
  • More land is being used to build fewer houses. From 1971 to 1985, two new single-family homes were built per acre used. From 1985 to 2000, single-family housing was built at a density of 1.3 units per acre. This spread of low-density development of single-family housing away from urban job centers contributed to higher amounts of land consumption, and increased the distance that people traveled to work.
  • The study concludes that the state's failure to keep up with housing demand, especially in multi-family and high density housing, has driven costs of existing housing to unmanageable levels. The study urges the construction of more multi-family and more densely built single-family units, thus relieving the pressure on lower-income people and people new to the housing market.

    The study is available on CHAPA's web site at www.chapa.org.

    LISC Launches Suburban Housing Initiative

    The Local Initiatives Support Corporation (LISC) has issued a Request for Proposals for grants of up to $70,000 to Greater Boston community based non-profits operating in suburban communities with less than 10% affordable housing.

    The RFP and application can be accessed on Boston LISC's web site: www.liscnet.org/boston (click on "what's new" page).

    Consultant Directory
    Expiring Use Database
    Homeownership Programs
    Housing Lotteries
    Jobs Board
    Links
    New England Housing Network
    Research and Reports
    Section 8 Program
    Smart Growth
    Companian Web sites
    Community Preservation Act
    Mass Accessible Housing Registry
    spacer
    Housing Policy and Advocacy CHAPA Publications Housing Briefs Join CHAPA About CHAPA spacer